Back to posts

The IPO Is Dead. Long Live the IPO.

Reflecting on the evolution of the IPO process, there was a time when it was seen as an invitation for investors to join a company's journey early on. Companies like Amazon, AOL, and Google entered public markets at a stage where public shareholders could benefit significantly from their growth. However, the landscape has changed. Today, while the IPO still holds importance, its role has shifted. For many leading companies, the IPO is no longer the starting point of their value-creation narrative; instead, it often marks the conclusion of a highly lucrative phase. If you're interested in where the most substantial growth occurs, it's clear that public markets are witnessing it later than before. This represents a significant structural shift in how we view IPOs and growth potential.

5 min read

There was a time when the IPO was an invitation.

A company would arrive in public markets still early in its journey, and investors who bought on listing day could participate in much of the growth that followed. Amazon, AOL, and Google all became part of the public imagination early enough that public shareholders captured a meaningful share of the compounding. That's no longer how the market works.

The IPO still matters, but it plays a different role now. For many of the most important companies, it is no longer the beginning of the value-creation story. It is much closer to the end of the most lucrative phase. If you care about where the strongest growth actually happens, public markets are seeing it later than they used to. That is a structural shift.

1781642847439

What Changed

The clearest evidence is time. In 1999, the median company reached the public market at around four years old. By 2024, that number had risen to 13.5 years. Companies are staying private far longer than they once did, and they are reaching public investors at a much more mature stage of development.

They are also arriving larger. Over that same period, the median market cap at IPO rose from roughly $453 million to more than $2 billion. Companies are not only spending more of their growth cycle in private markets. They are reaching public markets after much more of the value has already been built into the business.

This changes who captures the upside. Research from a16z shows how sharply the pattern has shifted. For IPOs between 2014 and 2019, more than 80% of market capitalization was created after listing. Public investors still participated meaningfully in the core growth phase. In the last five years, that changed. More than half of market cap was already created before the company ever reached public markets.

The compounding that once happened in public markets now happens increasingly in private ones.

1781642860445

Where the Growth Went

The public market did not simply lose a few interesting listings. It lost its role as the default place where high-growth companies spent their most formative years.

From 1980 to 2000, the U.S. saw more than 6,500 IPOs. From 2001 to 2022, there were fewer than 3,000, even though the second period was longer. Over the same time frame, the number of listed companies in the U.S. roughly halved. Meanwhile, private markets expanded dramatically, and the number of unicorns rose past 1,200.

That matters because some of the most important companies of the last decade built most of their value while remaining private. SpaceX, Stripe, Anthropic, and Databricks are all examples of businesses that became central to their categories before most public-market investors ever had a chance to participate.

The private market is no longer just a staging ground for future listings. In many cases, it has become the primary arena where high-quality growth investing actually happens.

That is a very different market structure from the one many investors still assume they are operating in.

The Modern IPO Problem

The irony is that the most recognizable IPOs often make the shift easiest to miss.

By the time a company becomes famous enough that retail investors feel like they know it well, the business has often already spent years absorbing private capital, building scale, and repricing upward across successive rounds. The public listing arrives after much of that work is done.

Uber is a useful example. It reached public markets after years of private funding and brand saturation. So did Lyft. Peloton followed a similar path. WeWork never made it to market at all. These were not obscure companies. They were among the most talked-about listings of their cycle. That visibility did not guarantee strong outcomes for late-arriving public investors.

Jay Ritter’s long-term research on IPO performance captures the pattern well. From 1980 to 2017, IPOs produced strong first-day pops on average, but then underperformed the broader market over the following three years by nearly the same amount. The excitement was real. The longer-term result was often less generous.

This is why the old intuition around IPOs has become less reliable. The listing can still be a major market event. It is no longer a dependable signal that the best part of the growth story is still ahead for public investors.

Why This Happened

The answer is capital. A much larger private market now exists before any public prospectus is filed. Growth equity firms, crossover funds, sovereign wealth funds, mutual funds, corporate venture arms, and family offices have all expanded the pool of capital available to late-stage private companies. Strong businesses can raise enormous amounts privately, stay private longer, and defer the public listing until a much later stage of maturity.

Airbnb illustrates the point well. In April 2020, it was valued at $18 billion. Eight months later, it went public at $114 billion. Public investors still had a strong company to buy. But a large portion of the most dramatic repricing had already happened before the IPO.

The velvet rope around private markets has always existed. What changed is that it now separates most investors from a much larger share of the value creation itself.

1781642882250

Why Tessera Exists

The lesson is not that public markets no longer matter. They remain liquid, transparent, and essential. The lesson is that they offer a different kind of exposure than they did a generation ago. They are more often the place where investors buy mature scale, not early compounding.

That is the gap Tessera is built around. T-SpaceX, T-Kalshi, and future T-assets exist because some of the most important companies in the market now do their most meaningful value creation while still private. The problem is no longer identifying those companies. The market already knows many of their names. The harder problem is access.

Tessera is designed to move that access point earlier. Instead of waiting for the IPO, the goal is to provide a path to economic exposure while the company is still in the private phase that public investors increasingly miss. That is why the structure matters. That is why transferability matters. That is why the pre-IPO window matters.

If the strongest growth now happens before listing, then the real question is no longer whether the IPO is alive or dead. The real question is whether access can move earlier too. That is what Tessera is building toward.

High risk. DYOR. Not financial advice. tessera.pe/terms

Share this post:Share on XCanonical URL